Hi Jean-Yves, There is indeed an existing plan to improve support for WebDAV in Restlet 1.2. It would be great if you could participate and contribute some features. See this RFE:
"Support WebDAV COPY and MOVE methods" http://restlet.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=346 Rob Heittman, who is also behind GoGoEgo, created this RFE and proposed some enhancements. He might be interested in helping you out. There are two path regarding Restlet and WebDAV that we could explore IMO: 1) Enhance the current Directory class to support COPY and MOVE and maybe other 'simple' features by default. 2) Add a new "com.restlet.ext.webdav" extension that would provide more complete and compliant Client and Server WebDAV connectors. What do you think? Best regards, Jerome -----Message d'origine----- De : news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Jean-Yves Cronier Envoyé : mercredi 25 juin 2008 00:12 À : [email protected] Objet : Re: Standard status-line in Status I am playing to development of an lightweight (and very partial) implementation of WebDAV protocol. (By the way, about this, I wonder how would it make more sense to develop it, so that I can give it to the RESTlet community) In short, in the specifications WebDAV, to describe the content of "collections", I need for each resource, to indicate its status: http://www.webdav.org/specs/rfc2518.html#ELEMENT_status Is there an issue (in your bugtracker) (targetting for RESTlet 1.2 ?) covering the implementation of WebDAV and with advices on how to implement it? If yes, I will be happy to work on it! Can we try to be inspired with GoGoEGO's code ? Or is it better to start a totaly new one ? Jerome Louvel wrote: > Hi Jean-Yves, > > Internally the NRE (Restlet engine) does convert the Status instance to the > standard format (see > com.noelios.restlet.http.HttpServerCall#writeResponseHead () method). > > The Status#toString() method just provides a convenient/simple string value. > Do you have a specific use case that requires this value to conform to the > HTTP spec? > > Best regards, > Jerome > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Jean-Yves Cronier > Envoyé : lundi 23 juin 2008 01:09 > À : [email protected] > Objet : Standard status-line in Status > > As defined in RFC2616 (6.1) > http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec6.html#sec6.1 > > Is it better to change org.restlet.data.Status#toString() to comform to > [HTTP-Version SP Status-Code SP Reason-Phrase CRLF] ? > > If no: What is the best way to build "Status-Line" of a > org.restlet.data.Status ? > >
