Hi, This sounds sensible. Just a quick question: what does this mean with respect to support for Java 6? I thought it had been mentioned that Java 6 support was planned for Restlet 2.0.
I'm not personally requiring Java 6, although support for SPNEGO would (unless we re-implement what was added to JGSS in Java 6 in Restlet, but I doubt it's worth the effort). Best wishes, Bruno. Jerome Louvel wrote: > Hi all, > > > > Looking at the amount of new features that we added so far since Restlet > 1.1 (with some more coming), the amount of refactoring and > reorganization done in the Restlet API (touching the core Resource API) > and extension packages and the growing number of special Restlet > editions (Java SE/Java EE, GWT, Google App Engine and soon Android), it > seems appropriate to rename the Restlet 1.2 release into Restlet 2.0. > > > > The idea is to give existing users an accurate feeling of the amount of > effort required when upgrading from Restlet 1.0 or Restlet 1.1 and for > new users to realize the amount of effort and changes done since Restlet > 1.x. > > > > I hope it will make sense to you guys. We have updated our issue tracker > and our roadmap here: > > http://www.restlet.org/about/roadmap > > > > Next release will be Restlet 2.0 M3 and will replace the current Restlet > 1.2 M2 (tagged “testing”). > > > > Best regards, > Jerome Louvel > -- > Restlet ~ Founder and Lead developer ~ http://www.restlet.org > <http://www.restlet.org/> > Noelios Technologies ~ Co-founder ~ http://www.noelios.com > <http://www.noelios.com/> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2080653
