I really like the JSE/JEE edition idea; this has been the #1 source of
Restlet newbie questions I have gotten in real life when people try to
maintain one of our Restlet based apps.  Typically we develop *outside* a
JEE environment (my feelings about JEE are well known...) but often some
other team has the requirement to bring an app we wrote into an existing JEE
ecosystem.  Simply being able to switch the Restlet edition will be much
more comprehensible and documentable.

It strikes me that an OSGi edition might be a way to circle back to some of
the conceptual differences (service locator patterns, etc) that we left
hanging in various OSGi related threads.  Is there already an RFE for that?
Tigris refuses to speak to me right now.

- R

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Jerome Louvel <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> The reasoning is that we you plan to use Restlet in a Java EE container,
> all you really need is the Servlet adapter extension. During
> development/prototyping, you could use the internal HTTP server and
> client connectors to do quick tests.
>
> Dustin, what is your use case requiring both the Servlet and the Simple
> extensions?
>
> Cheers,
> Jerome
>
>
> Thierry Boileau a écrit :
> > Hi Dustin,
> >
> >  >the fact that the simple extension is missing from the jee extension
> > is a bug, I've updated the svn repository.
> > I'm not very well waken up... Actually , it was chosen to remove the
> > "server" connectors from the jee edition except the "servlet" extension.
> > But as said previously, we can reconsider this.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Thierry Boileau
> >
> >
> >
> >> Hi Dustin,
> >>
> >> the fact that the simple extension is missing from the jee extension is
> >> a bug, I've updated the svn repository.
> >> It has ben chosen to exclude the servlet extension from the "jse"
> >> edition and integrate it inside the "jee" one. The latter can be
> >> consider as the jse edition plus the support of the servlet and all
> >> features that rely on servlet.
> >> Having said that we are totally open to reconsider the question, and
> >> ameliorate what we consider as a proposition.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Thierry Boileau
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Great work guys, thanks!
> >>>
> >>> I need features from both the jse, and the jee versions though (i.e.
> >>> Simple is missing from the jee version, and servlet is missing from the
> >>> jse version).  Is it best to download both, then merge them?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Dustin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Jerome Louvel wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Restleters,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> We are happy to announce our latest 2.0 milestone:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://blog.noelios.com/2009/08/06/restlet-2-0-m4-released/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> We have received an incredible amount of contributions since 2.0 M3:
> >>>> thank you all!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I want also like to highlight the key work done by Thierry, behind the
> >>>> covers, to bring you a fully automated port of all editions (Java SE,
> >>>> Java EE, GWT, GAE and Android) from a single code base. He also
> >>>> greatly improved our build system to provide dedicated distributions
> >>>> for each edition!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>> Jerome Louvel
> >>>> --
> >>>> Restlet ~ Founder and Lead developer ~ http://www.restlet.org
> >>>> <http://www.restlet.org/>
> >>>> Noelios Technologies ~ Co-founder ~ http://www.noelios.com
> >>>> <http://www.noelios.com/>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2381196
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------
> >
> http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2381203
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2381204
>

------------------------------------------------------
http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2381314

Reply via email to