Hi Tal,

thanks a lot for your work, it is very valuable for the community!
I've entered an issue for this problem: 
http://restlet.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=871

Best regards,
Thierry Boileau
> I have new information about this bug, and a workaround.
>
> So, this is a known and multi-year issue with java.nio in Java 6 on Linux 
> that has affected many nio projects, including Grizzly, Jetty and Netty. It's 
> been fixed only relatively recently for Java 7 and recent builds of Java 6. 
> Major Linux distributions do not include this fix.
>
> Here are just a few links to get you hot and bothered:
>
>   * http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6403933
>   * http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5135128
>   * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-937
>   * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-678
>
> The Grizzly project has employed a workaround. Unfortunately, it is only 
> available for Grizzly 2.0, which Restlet doesn't support as of yet.
>
> One solution for Restlet is to switch somehow to a latest version of Java in 
> which the nio bug is fixed.
>
> If this impossible, a reasonable workaround is to use the Jetty connector 
> with the blocking NIO connector instead of the default non-blocking NIO 
> connector. You may lose some scalability in doing so, making this an 
> unreasonable workaround for your application. Test to make sure.
>
> To do this, use the Jetty extension and set the "type" parameter to 2. 
> Pseudo-code:
>
> Server server = myComponent.getServers().add(Protocol.HTTPS, 8183);
> server.getContext().getParameters().add("type", 2);
>
> Relevant links:
>
> http://www.restlet.org/documentation/1.1/ext/com/noelios/restlet/ext/jetty/HttpServerHelper
>
> http://wiki.restlet.org/docs_2.0/13-restlet/28-restlet/78-restlet.html
>
> -Tal
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2382228
>
>

------------------------------------------------------
http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2382355

Reply via email to