Hi Arjohn,

On Dec 2, 2009, at 12:34 PM, Arjohn Kampman wrote:

> Hi Rhett, others,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion. Since I'm fairly new to the subject, I  
> hope
> you (and others) can help me a bit to get things clear.
>
> If I understand you correctly, you are suggesting to use a CAS proxy
> ticket as an authentication token. However, such a token can only be
> sent once to a CAS server for verification. This very much looks  
> like a
> problem for (preemptive) authentication in consecutive requests. Or am
> I overlooking something?

That's correct.  When the client application is using proxy tickets  
for authentication, it needs to get a new proxy ticket from the CAS  
server for each request.  This was intentional in the design of CAS.

Rhett

>
> Regards,
>
> Arjohn
>
>
> Rhett Sutphin wrote:
>> If I were adding support for just CAS, I would define a new challenge
>> scheme (call it something like cas_proxy_ticket) and define a Guard
>> and AuthenticationHelper pair which handle this scheme.  This would
>> mean that a client would need to acquire a proxy ticket and then
>> include it in the HTTP request as the Authentication header,  
>> something
>> like
>>
>> Authentication: cas_proxy_ticket PT-123456789
>>
>> Rhett
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2426434

------------------------------------------------------
http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2426475

Reply via email to