Hi Jonathan,

I've entered an issue for this interesting proposition.

http://restlet.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=984

Best regards,
Thierry Boileau

> I wish to propose another tunnel which is a bit more practical in 
> dealing with browser Accept header quirks.
>
> At present, browsers implement the accept header oddly.
>
> to quote Jon Blower's recent email to the list:
>
> "Firefox 3: Accept header is
> "text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8".
> Hence text/html is used, as expected.
>
> Chrome 0.2.149.30: Accept header is
> "text/xml,application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,text/html;q=0.9,text/plain;q=0.8,image/png,*/*;q=0.5".
>  So Chrome prefers application/xml to text/html and hence gets an XML
> representation by default.  Seems odd.
>
> IE7: Accept header does not include text/html, image/png or
> application/xml (!!) but does include "*/*" (yuck) so IE gets the
> variant that happens to be first in the Resource's list.  With the
> above code this just happens to be text/html.  So conneg doesn't
> really happen here at all."
>
> The current way of dealing with this is to use the User Agent (ua) 
> string and then 'fix-up' the accepted media.
>
> However, we have unknown browsers, or companies who change the ua string 
> of known browsers, or future versions that change the ua string, 
> different ua strings for different os, etc. This is hard to maintain and 
> leaves us open to serving incorrect representations to our users. - 
> which happens with chrome at the moment.
>
> An alternative I suggest would be to ignore the accept header and 
> provide html unless the person sending the request has gone to lengths 
> to send something specific. At lengths could mean where the accept 
> header did not contain any mention of html or xhtml at all. Then they 
> would be shown the representation they requested in the accept headers.
>
> This could be wrapped up in a tunnel like setUserAgentTunnel() and be 
> off by default. It would be an 'either or' to have this or the User 
> Agent Tunnel on.
>
> Any thoughts or opinions?
>
> Jon
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2430633
>
>

------------------------------------------------------
http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2430812

Reply via email to