Hi there, Which version of Restlet are you using? The date format issue has already been fixed for example in latest Restlet 1.1 and 2.0 versions.
Regarding the namespace, I've done a test with Restlet 2.0 and it now uses the default namespace for Atom. See attached example. BTW, I've just added some convenience constructors and new Relation constants to the Atom extension in SVN trunk (will appear in next snapshot). Then, I've tested the output with W3C's Atom feed validator and got a successful result: http://validator.w3.org/feed/#validate_by_input Best regards, Jerome Louvel -- Restlet ~ Founder and Technical Lead ~ http://www.restlet.org Noelios Technologies ~ http://www.noelios.com -----Message d'origine----- De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : vendredi 22 janvier 2010 10:22 À : [email protected] Objet : Atom validation Hi, I've tried running an atom feed generated using Resltet 1.1 through the w3c validator. I get errors about the timestamps ( i'm using the Java Date class) not being RFC3339 compatible. Also I get an error about the namespace: line 3, column 0: Avoid Namespace Prefix: atom [help] where line 3 is <atom:feed xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom";> I'm assuming that validation is a problem because some feed aggregators, e.g. FeedReader, refuse to display the feed, while others e.g. SharpReader do. Has anyone had any experience validating feeds created by Restlet? ------------------------------------------------------ http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=24411 19 ------------------------------------------------------ http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2449965
AtomTest.java
Description: Binary data
FeedServerResource.java
Description: Binary data
