Hi Jeff,
Did this problem get solved for you with 2.0 M7 or more recent snapshots? Best regards, Jerome Louvel -- Restlet ~ Founder and Technical Lead ~ <http://www.restlet.org/> http://www.restlet.org Noelios Technologies ~ <http://www.noelios.com/> http://www.noelios.com De : Thierry Boileau [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : lundi 1 février 2010 12:28 À : [email protected] Objet : Re: Suspended thread doing Client.put Hi Jeff, could make a test with the 2.0m7? It helpes to automatically release connection once the entity has been handled. Best regards, Thierry Boileau Yes, we made sure to update and we did notice that there were recent changes to the latch code. -jeff "Thierry Boileau" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... Hello Jeff, did you try the latest snapshot (the internal connectors have been updated a few days ago)? Best regards, Thierry Boileau We're seeing the vm blocking forever on a call to Client.put that worked fine on an earlier release of 2.0-SNAPSHOT: Thread [main] (Suspended) Unsafe.park(boolean, long) line: not available [native method] LockSupport.park(Object) line: 158 CountDownLatch$Sync(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer).parkAndCheckInterrupt() line: 747 [local variables unavailable] CountDownLatch$Sync(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer).doAcquireSharedInterruptibly (int) line: 905 CountDownLatch$Sync(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer).acquireSharedInterruptibly(i nt) line: 1217 CountDownLatch.await() line: 207 [local variables unavailable] HttpClientHelper(BaseClientHelper).handle(Request, Response) line: 490 Client.handle(Request, Response) line: 268 Client.handle(Request) line: 259 Client.put(Reference, Representation) line: 508 Any ideas? Has anyone else seen this behavior? -jeff ------------------------------------------------------ http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447 <http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2442 913> &dsMessageId=2442913 ------------------------------------------------------ http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2451089
