True. So, I guess the only way to remove "turn off" routes/restlets is to detach them?
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Stephan Koops <stephan.ko...@web.de> wrote: > Hi Tal, > > you could do some initialization and finalization work in your own > Restlets. > > best regards > Stephan > > Tal Liron schrieb: > > This is a basic attribute of any Restlet, but it seems like nowhere in > > the framework is it used. > > > > My expectation was that routers, filters, etc., would not pass requests > > on to a stopped target restlet. However, it seems that stopping restlets > > has no effect. > > > > Is this by design? In which case, what is the purpose of > starting/stopping? > > > > -Tal > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2451685 > ------------------------------------------------------ http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2451697
