Just a final confirmation from our side.
All tests on all environments run properly now, thx for the fix and the 
wrap up in 2.0.1

By the way: are the artifacts also going to be published on 
http://maven.restlet.org/org/restlet/jse/org.restlet/ ?

-marc=


On 09/03/2010 04:43 PM, Marc Portier wrote:
>
>
> On 09/03/2010 10:39 AM, Jerome Louvel wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> Thanks for the investigation. I've fixed the regressions in SVN trunk
>> and the build should pass again. It does on my machine.
>>
>
> Thanks for the fixes, normal (ant) build works indeed.
> I need the maven artifacts however and am building with a
> custom.properties file.
>
> It yields on my system:
>
>>
>> package:
>> [move] Moving 1 file to
>> /home/mpo/Projects/tigris.org/restlet/restlet-r6843/build/dist
>>
>> BUILD FAILED
>> /home/mpo/Projects/tigris.org/restlet/restlet-r6843/build/build.xml:228:
>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>> /home/mpo/Projects/tigris.org/restlet/restlet-r6843/build/build.xml:231:
>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>> /home/mpo/Projects/tigris.org/restlet/restlet-r6843/build/build.xml:157:
>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>> /home/mpo/Projects/tigris.org/restlet/restlet-r6843/build/build.xml:159:
>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>> /home/mpo/Projects/tigris.org/restlet/restlet-r6843/build/temp/jse/build.xml:2261:
>> Warning: Could not find file
>> /home/mpo/Projects/tigris.org/restlet/restlet-r6843/build/temp/jse/dist/restlet-jse-2.0snapshot.exe
>> to copy.
>
> Which I avoid silently with the attached patch.
>
> (I don't have nsis installed and am not generating the mentioned .exe so
> I let the move silently go by in that case.)
>
>
> With this I produced a 6843 build and am seeing things working ok. Which
> is however no big guarantee: the nature of this gc related behavior has
> been rather unpredictable in our experience.
>
> I'm setting up the new restlet dependency in our build and let you know
> next week if this actually solves things on all our environments: my
> personal environment never showed the issue, so I need to trigger some
> colleagues to do further testing in environments that _always_ barfed up
> on this.
>
>
> Related: this fix seems rather pressing for 2.0.0 in general no?
> Are you guys foreseeing a 2.0.1 for this shortly?
> (Or for any other reason)
>
> regards,
> -marc=

------------------------------------------------------
http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2657231

Reply via email to