> "If an Accept header field is present, and if the server cannot send a > response which is acceptable according to the combined Accept field value, > then the server SHOULD send a 406 (not acceptable) response" >
... I guess you *could* argue that this is not a bug as the word SHOULD above (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119#section-3) does give implementers some leeway to ignore the above sentence. However, it still seems to violate the principle of least surprise IMO. Ishaaq ------------------------------------------------------ http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2721661
