Hi Thierry, Yes with regards to the jetty extension. I don't use the Restlet client for my testing, I use loadUI.
Thanks, Ioannis On 11 Jul 2012, at 08:24, Thierry Boileau <thierry.boil...@restlet.com> wrote: > Hello Robert, Ioanis, > > did you try to use the "simple" or "jetty" extensions? They provide a HTTP > server connector that we consider to be more stable than the internal HTTP > connector which is fine for development but not for production systems. We > are on the way to provide a good one with the 2.1 release. > I guess the same question applies for the client application : you can use > the "net" or the "httpclient" extensions. We consider also that these > extensions provide a more stable client connector than the internal one. > > Best regards, > Thierry Boileau > > > Yes it was. I let Restlet do all the heavy resource lifting and made sure my > domain logic was as clean as possible. I do not recall a single instance > where I had to explicitly clean up something belonging to Restlet. > > >> Hi Robert, neat project you have going on there. I will answer a tiny part > >> of your question, I've load tested 2.1-RC5 heavily and after careful > >> tweaking > >> I've yet to reach the worker limit scenario you detail here. > >> > >> My setup is: 150 maxThreads, 10 minThreads, 145 lowThreads, maxQueued 20 > >> but ofc YMMV. > > > > Thanks for the reply Ioannis. So did the careful tweaking you did come down > > to just those parameters above? > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2977064 > > ------------------------------------------------------ > http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2977951 > ------------------------------------------------------ http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2983299
