The watts per KG is the load or receiver (your body) so all a 20KG phone would
do is make it worse as the battery life would be longer :-)
--- On Tue, 9/15/09, Phil P. <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Phil P. <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [SCFN] Study on radiation from cellphones
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2009, 7:42 PM
#yiv925017955 .hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;padding:0px;}
#yiv925017955 {
font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}
Watts per Kg? Allrighty then, let's all buy 20Kg. cell phones so the W/Kg
emissions drop dramatically. We don't have to worry about cell phone zap
thataway.
Seems to me that W/Kg is more appropriate to describe battery energy densities.
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:01:17 -0700
From: [email protected]
To:
Subject: [SCFN] Study on radiation from cellphones
http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=24217&tag=nl.e539
Bing brings you health info from trusted sources. Try it now!
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
SoCalFreeNet.org General Discussion List
To unsubscribe, please visit:
http://socalfreenet.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_socalfreenet.org_______________________________________________
SoCalFreeNet.org General Discussion List
To unsubscribe, please visit:
http://socalfreenet.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_socalfreenet.org
