since Apple is unix based, you can [maybe] also use Kismet, right?
linux is general has a ton of wifi tools, you just need to use supported HW.

On 7/9/10, [email protected]
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Send Discuss mailing list submissions to
>       [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       http://socalfreenet.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_socalfreenet.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Discuss digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. USB Wifi device worth adding to your toolkit ([email protected])
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:51:49 -0400
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: [SCFN] USB Wifi device worth adding to your toolkit
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Since macs are getting to be more popular, thought I'd share one USB WiFi
> device that is worth adding to your toolkit:
>
> www.bearextender.com
>
> Basically the "802.11" apple branded airport cards in mac products are not
> the greatest, for example in my old iBook for example the radio Output
> Power: 32 mW (15 dBm)
>
> To pick up WiFi in the golden Hill network on a consistent basis, the
> built in WiFi in apple products isn't the greatest,  the D-Link 810+
> ethernet bridge Michael hacked worked great but had problems when the
> various nodes in the network didn't have have a way to connect to the
> network (i.e. a nearby meraki AP had a strong signal, but didn't have a
> direct cable/DSL feed).
>
> To get around the limitations of the weak radio and apple "software"
> issues that make it difficult to select an access point within the GH
> network that might not have the strongest signal, but has a direct
> cable/DSL feed, can be fixed with a high powered (700 mW) "bear extender"
> USB radio/software.
>
> The software user interface for the USB bear extender, isn't all that
> polished when compared the steve jobs approved mac OS which limits user
> choices. But any WiFi geek using a mac, the bear extender I a worth while
> purchase, because it has a radio that is a magnitude more powerful than
> apple's WifI branded "airport" and software that allows a user to pick
> which AP they want to connect to.
>
> See attachment of screenshot that allows user to accomplish a "site
> survey" not possible with basic apple hardware/software.
>
> ben
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> DISCLAIMER: This is your last chance. After this,
> there is no turning back. You take the blue pill
> - the story ends, you wake up in your bed and
> believe whatever you want to believe. You take
> the red pill - you stay in Wonderland and
> I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes.
>
> http://phaster.com/_peak/_peak_expectations.html
>
> P.S. during an economic crisis, isn't it
> comforting to know that "For every economist,
> there exists an equal and opposite economist."
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: bear_extender_wireless_utility.gif
> Type: image/gif
> Size: 58004 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL:
> <http://socalfreenet.org/pipermail/discuss_socalfreenet.org/attachments/20100709/b17aa541/attachment.gif>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> SoCalFreeNet.org General Discussion List
> To unsubscribe, please visit:
> http://socalfreenet.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_socalfreenet.org
>
> End of Discuss Digest, Vol 64, Issue 1
> **************************************
>

_______________________________________________
SoCalFreeNet.org General Discussion List
To unsubscribe, please visit: 
http://socalfreenet.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_socalfreenet.org

Reply via email to