What do you mean by competing rhythms?

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Michael Render
<[email protected]>wrote:

> I don't think your melodies suck. I think you just straightjacket yourself
> with your chord structures.
>
> Take for example Mole Day 2 and Quirkiness. They both use a simple C minor
> pattern of root, minor third and fourth. Almost an arpeggio instead of
> chords. That leaves you almost no wiggle room to move about. You are stuck
> in a very claustrophobic box. Everything has to fit within a C minor chord
> with a D major passing, resolving back to C minor.
>
> In Happy WubDub you do use a more complex chord scheme. But you arpeggiate
> the chords very tightly. No inversions. This competes with any melodic
> phrase and again straightjackets where you can go with the melody. Your
> rhythms also compete.
>
> We also need surprise and tension/release. Even the most repetitive
> techno/dubstep stuff adds change, whether just bringing tracks in and out,
> dramatic filter sweeps or stopping to drone on a beat or phrase.
>
> My challenge to you would be:
> Build richer chord structures with thought to tension/release and use
> inversions to give yourself breathing room.
> Let parts of you melody/harmony/chords have dramatically different rhythms.
> Don't constantly repeat small patterns. Mix it up and surprise us.
>
> I think you will find that if you give yourself enough room, better
> melodies will flow.
>
> Oh, and don't stop. Experience is the absolute best teacher.
>
> Michael Render
>
>
> Michael Render On 11/9/2013 10:48 PM, Ben Lippincott wrote:
>
>> Well, first off, I would like some tips. Here's my soundcloud:
>> http://www.soundcloud.com/ben-lippincott/
>>
>> I use FL Studio and Logic Pro X.
>>
>> I really suck at writing melodies. :P
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>



-- 
Thanks!
Ben Lippincott
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to