Seems like a different medium might work better. I fear that different
people will have different opinions about what is off-topic.
Maybe instead....
Fourm
Reddit
etc.


On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Ben Lippincott
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Wooot! Let's do it!
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Bethany Munyan <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I was thinking the same thing. I like the idea of having an 'off-topic'
>> mailing list.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Chris Egeland <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Hey hackers!
>>>
>>> I've been watching the mailing lists very closely for some time now, and
>>> have noticed a general uptrend in the volume of email sent to the discuss
>>> list.  Sometimes we get offtopic and go off on tangents about toast, or
>>> other topics which are fun to talk about, but are ultimately irrelevant to
>>> the space itself.  Usually, this isn't a problem, but for someone who is
>>> interested in the space, but not the minutiae of every little bit of
>>> day-to-day operations, it can quickly turn into an overwhelming amount of
>>> email.
>>>
>>> Today, I'm asking for input on how we should proceed with the mailing
>>> lists.  As you may know, we currently have 5 lists, two of which are
>>> public, one semipublic, and two private. [email protected] and
>>> [email protected] are the two that everyone knows about.  Members may
>>> know that they are automatically subscribed to [email protected].
>>>  Board members are subscribed to [email protected] and us sysadmin folk
>>> are members of [email protected].
>>>
>>> My recommendation is to create an "offtopic" list, which would have very
>>> very lax rules on what can be posted.  Anything you want to chat about.
>>>  Want to debate why the RubberDucks is a terrible team name and the Aeros
>>> was WAY better?  Sure, no problem.  Got a pothole on Market street that
>>> irks you every day?  Have at it.  Joke threads? Toast? No problem.  The
>>> other side to this idea is that the discuss list would have some basic
>>> rules imposed that mean that any topics to the discuss list would be
>>> required to be relevant to the space itself.  Projects occurring at the
>>> space would be relevant topics, open hours discussion, meeting minutes, etc.
>>>
>>> So, let me know what you guys think.  I'm not officially proposing this,
>>> but we may chat about it at the next meeting as a discussion topic, because
>>> it would fundamentally mean we change how the mailing lists are organized
>>> and structured.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks!
> Ben Lippincott
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to