Clones are people two, my friends. Can anyone direct me to a good not-online but local place to get electronic n functioning cool stuff in addition to the microcenter in Cleveland that Torrie mentioned, in person in case I procrastinated on ordering and need to pick stuff up over the weekend for immediate prototyping? Devin told us about an amazing place and handed me a cool catalog and I'm trying to redig them up (b/c organized I am not) & Alex mentioned a place of magnets (these have both become two of my newest favorite Ohio places) but I am having trouble re-finding them because I am just that silly. :)
*(ooh ooh, things like these: WS2812* Integrated Light Source...I *think. Lights or functional things with sensors built into them(??) requiring only basic coding language from brand new programmers and maybe being functional with a tiny duino using only the most simple wiring? * http://learn.adafruit.com/adafruit-neopixel-uberguide http://www.adafruit.com/products/1260 ?*) * Anyway...we're off. Have fun stormin' the castle! On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Andrew Buczko <[email protected]>wrote: > Philip, no, What I am suggesting is to go into the invention process as a > business prospect. I.E. Did you do do a Patent Search to make sure that no > one else has invented a "Hawking clone" ? Plus a clone such as a living > being may not be patent-able. And you wouldn't be "signing up" for > anything. You would be hiring a patent attorney, a doctor, and many other > personnel to get your Hawking clone from idea to reality. > > Patients are not cheep, so you have to plan out how your are going to pay > for one (I spent over $9,000.00 on mine and it took me 3 years to get it) > If you have an idea I can help you with getting started. If I'm not > around, then I recommend the Hudson Inventors group. > > Andy > > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Philip P. Patnode <[email protected]>wrote: > >> @Andrew >> >> Are you saying I get a *patient* if I start the funding part of a new >> product/invention process? >> >> Sign me up for a Hawking clone, please. >> >> This will be so cool! >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:35 AM, alex kot <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I bought a Starter Kit made by OSEPP from microcenter, not as cool as >>> the one Torrie showed from SparkFun. I know Microcenter sells SparkFun >>> products, but I am not sure if they have the one she listed yet. Might >>> stop by next time when I am at work (Microcenter is up in Cleveland). >>> >>> >>> On Thursday, November 28, 2013 12:28 AM, Andrew Buczko < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> "prototyping kit for a brand new inventor" >>> The kit Torrie suggested looks great, and would be nice to >>> have available at SynHak. >>> >>> When people ask about how to invent something, I like to talk to them >>> about Starting their own business with the thing that they want to invent. >>> Since you need to find some way to pay for everything that goes with >>> getting a patient. There are a lot of things that people don't think about >>> :) >>> >>> Hmm, I really need some free time so that I can write a talk about it. >>> Andy >>> >>> PS, you can also contact the Hudson inventors group for suggestions too. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Torrie Fischer < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 13:59:55 Pierce wrote: >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > Could I ask for an opinion from anyone who has a few minutes & feels >>> like >>> > weighing in? >>> > >>> > If I was trying to put together a prototyping kit for a brand >>> new >>> > inventor, what would go into it? >>> > >>> > Goals: >>> > A really wide range of possible inventions. >>> > Functional, as well as representative, stuff, not *just* 'model of' >>> stuff. >>> > A bunny slope learning curve. >>> > An exciting, real, substantive feel. >>> > Access to many different disciplines (mechanical, electrical, robotic, >>> > programming, crafty, modern material marvels, etc.?) of making and an >>> > encouragement to fuzz those lines! >>> > Ideal for a systems approach or big picture thinking approach to >>> invention. >>> > >>> > >>> > Two cost types: >>> > 1.) the skies the limit >>> > & >>> > 2.) $100 or $200 for two dozen inventors to take turns, in teams, for >>> many >>> > dismantle-n-rebuild real inventions. >>> > >>> > I've given this bunches of thought but I would like to hear from other >>> > people with different ideas. If this is the wrong forum for this big a >>> > question, feel free to delete and respond with the appropriate >>> > e-chastisement. >>> >>> You might be looking for the Sparkfun Inventor's Kit as a source of >>> inspiration for electronics: >>> >>> https://www.sparkfun.com/products/11576 >>> >>> Its only $90 and would easily cover everything about electronics, >>> programming, >>> and a touch of robotics. I'm not sure for the other bits though. >>> >>> > >>> > Thanks for everything and hello to all from Steph, >>> > (One of the new persons, with brown hair, who's been visiting lately.) >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
