below are the minutes from tonight's board meeting:



Board meeting 3/10/14

In attendance:
Becca Salchak

Craig Bergdorf

Andrew Buczko

 Justin Herman

Chris Egeland

Devin Wolfe

Torri Ficher

AJ9

Philip Patnode

Ken Burns

Mike Grieslik

Alex Kot



No moderator

Devin opens by covering procedure the board functions is to make sure that
the space runs properly

Ken: points of contention going on at the space need for community Working
Group to help solve problems and mediate. The CWG Consists of members not
tied to the conflict at hand.

Items like the sublease, proposal to remove from office. Ken put out a temp
proposal about the community working group and plans on proposing it at the
meeting this week.

 Thinks could be around 5 people on the CWG he volunteers to be one of them
no board members or champions. Gives the parties involved would be given a
chance to share their side in private. And the CWG would come to a decision
that is true to bylaws and the interest of the group. And the
recommendations would go before the board and the membership without open
debate. The members would vote on the recommendations and then carried out.
All the notes of the moderation would be archived off so members could
audit the notes if the so wished. He would like to have this in place in a
week so within the next few weeks we will be able to act on it.

Aj9: asks would tis take the power away from the leaders?

Ken: no, they have no authority they can only make recommendations.

Becca: are these permanent members?

Ken: yes but after the few issues we have are solved they would be dissolved

Torri: likes this model, she thinks we should review after the process is
done and possibly make a bylaw amendment.

Mike: does the group bypass the board?

Ken: results first go to the board they can decide if the proper procedures
were followed then it would be released to the members.

Chris: States that the discussion on the removal of Devin and Justin has
been proposed and that we will discuss it at the meeting this week. Then
will be voted on the following

AJ9: Has there been any discussion of hiring an outside party to mediate?

Ken: There hasn't been a discussion yet but if we don't see a way forward
he suggests  that we possibly go that route.

Craig: suggests we get outside people to sit on this board.

Ken: either way they are just making a recommendation.

Justin: feels that a professional mediator but because of time restraint we
might not be able to use outside source.

Ken: is there a master list of members?

Chris: yes and as a member you can request from Andrew.

Justin: can we use non members

Ken: that is up for discussion. Who decides the group?

Chris: feels it should be up to members. Or have the board select the
people then the membership agrees on it.

Devin: that's going to drag on the parties in the dispute should decide

AJ9: agrees

Craig: thinks we should take a quick vote

Justin: both sides submit 3 non partial people then the members can decide

Chris : for your proposal will you submit the list of the issues

Ken: yes I will list the sub-lease and the removal of officers. If we could
refrain from talking about them until we get through this process just to
keep the heat down.





Aj:formally introduced herself, has liability insurance for her area of
synhak, takes role of liaison for something new entertainment for this.

Devin: we don't have a formal complaint system when we formed synhak the
board would handle business and champions handle day to day.

Torri: champion manages day to day bills, trash, building maintenance.
Nothing more but it has been extended to conflict res. But doest feel that
is appropriate that we should be able to solve our issues as adults.
Champions have the power to doacraticly take over an office.

Devin: can we agree on more concrete terms?

Torrie: I think the members should be involved

Devin: then it will eventually vote on and become a bylaw

Torri:No

Devin: so far most of the complaints already go to the champions.

Andy: can we have a figure head

Torri: I am terrified of that no

Chris: technically as champion I have no authority but people still ask
permission from me

Torri: that is just a social thing that we need to break. They can be
conflict res. People if they want to be they are like the manager of
mcdonalds

Devin: what do we do about complaints?

Torri: that is wat the CWG does

Devin: but they are not concrete...

Torri: the members should be responsible for this but I want the CWG to be
permanent I wish to continue this Tuesday

Justin: I think this could be a way to go  I think we should start with our
champions and if they are then found to ave a conflict of intrest then
someone else would be brought in.

Devin what would craig do if he has a problem with devin then who does he
go to

Torri: I feel we should stop this convo and continue it tomorrow Chris
seconds

Devin: torri is not a board member chris motions and craig seconds Vote? Ok
vote passed table until tomorrow

Andy: I propose to remove non members from discuss

Devin I feel we move the discussions to the  members list for these
discussions and not just the discuss list I don't feel it needs to be a
proposal

Andy: I retract that proposal.

Alex: What is the Sysadmin can we update the bylaws

Torri: Sysadmin I feel isn't necessary unmles he is more a security officer
that would monitor a pincode system and making sure that we are reasonably
safe from anyone who would want to take retribution

Justin:they should be responsible for our website and a point of contact
for people who want to work on the network

Torri: I feel that chris as sysadmin didn't maintain by himself we all did
we don't need just one person for this  we have the noc list

Alex: perhaps writing up compliance laws to stop people from torrenting and
stuff

Justin:thinks that a lot of us can do the positions as officers but each
officer is a point of contact.

Torri: thinks that we need to police ourselves.

Alex: but it is a liability because if someone comes in to audit they will
ask for our compliance acceptable use policy

Chri: I feel that they should comply with time warners policy

Becca: I feel like we should have one of these when we sign on to the wifi

Chris: sysadmin was a deligation campions

Devin: I agree with Becc just post it on the wall

Craig: print out time warner

Chris: put it in the binder web filter?

Everyone: no

Devin: not a proposal 3 page emails? Come on make it short

Torri: im not going to make simple emails for complex situations

Devin: lets do this for emails and discussion

Devin: discuss was shut down... whats the acceptable use.

Torri: I locked it because the list is ment for discussion and people were
just shitting on each other I felt it was a bad representation of us.

Becca: I feel like it should be mentioned to the board first

Justin: I feel like we were being grounded

Devin we need to watch our tone... some people were really frantic because
there were worried parties

Becca: I didn't even understand what was going on...

Torri: yes that was un excellent im sorry I should have explained it

Devin: I feel it should be a consensus not a single person with the power

Chris: what authority were you using

Torri: I was using doacracy to put out the fires I think we need to decide
and make rules for list moderation

Devin: doacracy isn't just doing it is what the consensus and the person
who is willing to step up  does it. We need to define doacracy

Chris: I don't think it requires consensus I think if I feel the community
will agree with it then it is ok

Devin : but what if what you think the consensus is is actually not the
consensus we need to evaluate how we define doacracy not noisebridge

Torrie: if it is going to affect the community then you are going to have
to take responsibility

Justin : I agree that we need to fine our own and not just follow the other
haker spaces blindly

Torri: doacracy consensus and excellence go hand and hand.

Craig: isn't this why we have maintainers?

Chris: Maintainers is entirely volunteer maintainers arnt required to
maintain

Torri: I wanted Maintainers to be like open source Maintainers. Isn't to
maintain but to make it easier for others to contribute encourages
deligation does not run the show.

Alex: I think the maintainers should actually be a point of reference

Justin: I propose we table this everyone second that motion passed meeting
over.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to