Would $94.50 be the rate paid by an individual paying 3 months at one time?
(3*35) = 105 10% of 105 = 10.5 105-10.5=94.5 V/R Tim Seeley From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Omar Rassi Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 5:36 PM To: SYN/HAK discussion list Subject: Re: [SH-Discuss] Group discounts I think your 7 month 3 people example fall in the 20% discount if the largest discount applies. Other than that I see no issue with this. Being able to pay dues for multiple people seem like an more efficient structure than having two different pricing plans (a family discount plan and bulk membership plan). On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Torrie Fischer <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I want to resume our previous discussions about the family discount plans. Previous thread: https://synhak.org/pipermail/discuss/2014-January/006706.html First, I agree with Andrew's suggestion that the student and senior rates should be combined into one. $15 seems reasonable, yeah? Second, the discount system. I'd like to stick with the idea of being able to buy subscriptions in blocks. However, I'd like to adopt a constant discount rate based on how many unique individuals are being paid for, with a disjoint discount for the number of months that are bought for a single person. Here's how I think it can be broken down for a single person: * 0% discount for 1 month * 10% discount for 3 or more months And if it is for a whole group: * 15% discount for 2-6 people * 20% discount for 7 or more If multiple discounts are available, the largest one will be used. Examples: * 1 person, 1 month: $35, 0% discount * 1 person, 2 months: $70, 0% discount * 1 person, 3 months: $101.5, 10% discount of $105 * 2 people, 1 month for each person: $59.50, 15% discount of $70 * 2 people, 2 months for each person: $119, 15% discount of $140 * 2 people, 3 months for each person: $178.50, 15% discount of $210 * 7 people, 3 months for each person: $624.75, 15% discount of $735 This should be quite a bit simpler than the previous idea, and still keeps with the original idea of making it easier for couples or families to support themselves. Finally, I am considering developing a sliding scale for the low income rate. I'm not too sure how that would get implemented, but charging a percentage of membership dues based on the ability to pay seems a lot more fair than pegging everyone at $15/mo, especially since we're all about inclusiveness. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
