On Friday, April 04, 2014 10:56:23 alex kot wrote: > I am just surprised torrie suggested slack as an option.
SYNHAK has problems. They need fixed. I don't care what technology fixes SYNHAK. Can you (and others who do this stuff) please keep this stuff off discuss@ and stay on topic? > > > > ------------------------------ > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 1:14 PM EDT Philip P. Patnode wrote: > >Add my name as a member to be invited. > > > >Thanks. > > > >On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Torrie Fischer <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Heya, folks. > >> > >> A few other spaces have started to experiment with using Slack as a > >> discussion > >> method that is limited to their membership. > >> > >> http://slack.com/ > >> > >> I've created an instance for us to try it out as a way of quietly > >> figuring > >> out > >> to build a community working group, or governance hacking, planning the > >> machine shop's features, and such. > >> > >> They don't have any kind of public signup if you wish to join the synhak > >> slack, so please let me know if you are interested and I will get you an > >> invite. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Discuss mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
