No consensus is needed in my opinion. Just plan a meeting and see who shows up.
On May 2, 2014 9:16 PM, a l <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does this -need- a proposal to happen? Historically we have reserved > proposals to large changes to how the community conducts it's business. > Organizing projects to avoid squished toes and bruised egos is great, but I > guess I'm not sure we need an official structured work group to get shelves > built or pallet floors put together. > I don't have any hard issues with this(ie; would not block) on the face, just > wondering if we -need- an official-on-the-books rule to accomplish it. Was > this the same problem build@ and bizops@ were supposed to solve? Related: If > we make this, will it actually get used? We have a history of poor > communication. > > regards, > Andrew L > > > On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Philip P. Patnode <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Craig, >> >> Add me to the list. >> >> I will be happy to help in any way I can. >> >> A good plan and a project leader will be an effective solution to the chaos >> now in progress. >> >> Philip >> >> >> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 3:17 AM, Steve Radonich IV <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> I love this idea Craig. I would definitely second it. >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 01:12:54 -0400 >>> From: [email protected] >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [SH-Discuss] c-bog >>> >>> >>> I am working on a proposal for a C-BOG >>> (community build-out group, (hyphen added for awesomeness when saying out >>> loud)) >>> In neo-synhak fashion I'm trying to talk with groups of people individually >>> before making a proposal that someone would go as far as to block. As with >>> the last one I researched (laptop-gate era), I'm willing to drop if it will >>> start a civil war. >>> >>> I feel most of our drama comes from too many cooks in the kitchen; the >>> sooner many of us can feel like they can do their own projects again >>> without feeling selfish if they are at the space and not working on >>> infrastructure, the better. It has breed entitlement, countless >>> disagreements on how things "must" be done, and the worst: fights on who >>> the space owes more. (hint: the answer should be nobody, ever.) >>> >>> The idea of the proposal is to create a separate and temporary standard >>> forman/project-lead/helper organizational structure of volunteers working >>> towards a build-out goal consensed by the membership, funded by a >>> cash-on-card budget (in the area of $2-4k). The treasurer would be >>> instrumental in this process. In my head, this is little more than walls, >>> details, and purchasing of tools so many members who have walked away >>> (during this struggle) have de-donated. Other than the piles of stuff >>> being where the racks were, the place looks mostly the same since March. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> p.s. >>> If we had a guideline that: don't say anything you wouldn't say to >>> someone's face. I'm guessing the bulk of the last few days email would not >>> have been sent thanks to knowledge of what responses words can have when >>> your not looking at your target through a computer screen. We will all see >>> each other again, we live in the same community and share the same love of >>> something that exists at a single physical location. Why people would use >>> such strong words over email instead of directly to their adversary's face >>> I must not grasp. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
