Creo que hay una noticia ya taducida sobre esto en la lista. Creo que las 
respuestas se iran dando paulatinamente.

On 9/3/05, Richard/g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> 
> Para su información.
> Si alguien puede traducirlo, por favor avise en la lista par evitar
> duplicación de esfuerzas.
> 
> saludos,
> Richard.
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded Message ----------
> 
> Subject: [marcon] License Simplification
> Date: Friday 02 September 2005 11:30
> From: Louis Suarez-Potts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: John McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jacqueline
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Erwin Tenhumberg
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stefan Taxhet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Charles-H.Schulz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Dear MarCons,
> 
> The below is a statement agreed upon by the Community Council
> pertaining to a simplification of our licensing structure. Please
> translate and distribute it as you will. If you have questions,
> and
> I am sure you will, don't hesitate to ask us directly.
> 
> Cheers,
> Louis
> 
> 
> 
> On 2 September 2005 Sun Microsystems announced that it was retiring
> the Sun Industry Standards Source License (SISSL), an Open Source
> Initiative (OSI)-approved software license. In recent weeks, the
> OSI, which authorises open-source licenses, has been discussing
> limiting license proliferation, so as to make the process of
> choosing
> a license easier for developers and companies. Sun's move is in
> support of that objective.
> 
> How does this move affect OpenOffice.org? As most know,
> OpenOffice.org code was launched under the dual banner of the SISSL
> and LGPL; licensees could choose which one they wanted to use, and
> nearly all have chosen the LGPL. Effective with the announcement
> that Sun is retiring the SISSL, however, OpenOffice.org will in the
> future only be licensed under the LGPL.
> 
> For users, the simplification means: no change. OpenOffice.org
> remains free to use, distribute, even sell. One can freely use it
> in
> commercial as well as government environments; nothing has changed.
> 
> For vendors, distributors, add-on and plug-in writers of
> OpenOffice.org: The LGPL allows for commercial distribution
> without
> affecting derived products in the same way as the GPL.
> 
> For developers and other contributors: As the code will be
> licensed
> only under the LGPL, modifications to the source must be published.
> (The SISSL did not require all changes to the source to be
> published.) As most OpenOffice.org contributors are already openly
> contributing to the community, we anticipate no problems. And for
> those who have been using the SISSL exclusively, we invite you to
> join us.
> 
> The OpenOffice.org Community Council
> 
> http://council.openoffice.org
> http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/license-change.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-- 
Alexandro Colorado

Responder a