There is also QForms if you want to google that. It was implemented pretty well.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 7:25 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] validation techniques for existing application There is a reusable-extensible (server side) validation component in my Tardis framework. Feel free to check it out and if you like it, just grab it out of the framework and do whatever you please with it. If you have any questions about it, feel free to contact me off list. http://www.illumineti.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=cat&catid=28B26753-C09F-25C5-832AE045709158C1 Shawn Gorrell Web Development Applications Architect Federal Reserve Bank - Atlanta Office (404) 498-8449 "Ajas Mohammed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/25/2007 12:52 AM Please respond to [email protected] To [email protected] cc Subject [ACFUG Discuss] validation techniques for existing application Hi, We have about 5 web applications which fork from the same code, but ofcourse they have own customizations and also differ a lot from each other as the clients are different, meaning different needs and lots of different code even though the origin is the same code. Whenever we have new client, we use the code and the code grows from there on. Now to my main question. We dont have proper validation in any of our 5 or whatever no. of code we have. The main code which we use is so mixed with different validation that I cannot explain i.e. some cfforms, some javascript validation, some hidden fields i.e _required validation etc. So I was thinking that next time we have a new client, I should (or my team) add validation to the code we use such that we have all things covered atleast User interface * error description etc those kind of things. I wanted to know how to handle this? can anyone share there experience. What I wanted to achieve was a code reusable approach so that if I need same validation elsewhere I dont have to write it again. Something on the lines of CFC's I would say. This is my own interest and I will do at my own time. No one is bothered or care to have this functionality. Its just that the developer inside me cannot live with this fact that the application is not Perfect. I want it to be Perfect. After all, you live and die by your code. -- <Ajas Mohammed /> <http://ajashadi.blogspot.com/> http://ajashadi.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ <http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform> http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see <http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists> http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ <http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/> http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by <http://www.fusionlink.com/> FusionLink ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink <http://www.fusionlink.com> ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -------------------------------------------------------------
