Thanks to all for comments. I should have been more detailed. Yes, spaces in field names is very bad. I am working with a process that uploads an Excel Spreadsheet that is created by a client. Yes, I could go back to them and tell them "no spaces", but I wanted to try to find a solution that wouldn't require that. Once the SS has been uploaded, I then create a JDBC connection to the workbook and read the data in a specific sheet. That works fine. Now I have a query object that I am trying to join to a SQL database query to compare values. Yes, I can loop over the SS query and do lots of separate queries but I wanted to create a single query solution with a JOIN statement.
So the answer seems to be NO QoQ does not support column names with spaces, not even using the proper "[]" bracket syntax. Is this correct? J. Scott Councill Software Engineer II Direct: 404.601.4390 Cell: 804.267.9555 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spunlogic Expect More From the Web <http://www.spunlogic.com/?CMP=EMC-OutlookSig> www.spunlogic.com Looking for insights and tips on all aspects of interactive marketing? Visit <http://www.spunlogic.com/blog/?CMP=EMC-OutlookSig> Spunlogic's Blog for a look inside the minds of a leading interactive agency. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cameron Childress Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 9:19 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] QoQ question To be fair, QoQ solves an entirely different problem than Stored Procs. QoQ was also not designed to be an entire DB server, and hopefully never will be. QoQ is quirky as hell, yes, but for the newbies out there on the list it would be wrong (IMHO) to make a blanket recommendation about "using stored procedures or functions instead of QoQ" without pointing out that they solve entirely different problems, and really the question of which (SP or QoQ) you should use would hopefully have been asked an answered way before this point in Scott's development (which I'm sure it was). -Cameron On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Tommy Geist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If I may offer some CONSTRUCTIVE answers like John, Query of Queries are very limited in their abilities compared to what modern databases will do. I believe they are even behind the basic mySQL so I would recommend using stored procedures or functions instead of QoQ. -- Cameron Childress Sumo Consulting Inc http://www.sumoc.com --- cell: 678.637.5072 aim: cameroncf email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------- Annual Sponsor - Figleaf Software <http://www.figleaf.com> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink <http://www.fusionlink.com> ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- Annual Sponsor FigLeaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -------------------------------------------------------------
