Also, this is assuming that all this box does is serve CF. Obviously take the entire memory footprint/usage into account if that box is doing double duty.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Steve Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > Well since the JVM can't allocate more than 2gb of memory on Windows it > won't start if you set it higher. It looks like you aren't hurting for > memory in those charts. You can (and I would recommend) upping the # of > maximum requests based on these charts (low cpu, low memory usage). Now you > may have to test it and see what would be the sweet spot on your box. I > would double it and see how it performs and then review it and if the > memory/cpu stays stable you could keep bumping it up until you see an issue > there and then you'll probably get your box to perform well under concurrent > load. Its more of an art/tweaking thing than it is a "set it to X" sort of a > thing. > > -Steve > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Ajas Mohammed <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am attaching a snapshot of FusionReactor's system metrics page which >> shows no. of requests/sec. Recently, it went to as high as above 24. >> >> We use CF 7 on Windows Server 2003, Intel Xeon CPU E5450 @ 3.00 GHZ, 3.99 >> GB of RAM and the setting for *Maximum number of simultaneous requests is >> set to default 8. >> >> *We have not changed any JVM Memory settings.* The **Minimum JVM Heap >> Size (MB)* is blank and * Maximum JVM Heap Size (MB)* is 512. >> >> Anyone wants to share their thoughts on the setting for *Maximum number >> of simultaneous requests, ** Maximum JVM Heap Size (MB) **or *any >> general suggestions*?* Is it ok to up the Maximum no. of simultaneous >> requests? >> >> Thanks, >> >> <Ajas Mohammed /> >> http://ajashadi.blogspot.com >> We cannot become what we need to be, remaining what we are. >> No matter what, find a way. Because thats what winners do. >> You can't improve what you don't measure. >> Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, >> sincere effort, intelligent direction and skillful execution; it represents >> the wise choice of many alternatives. >> > > > > -- > Steve Ross > web application & interface developer > http://blog.stevensross.com > [mobile] (912) 344-8113 > [ AIM / Yahoo! : zeriumsteven ] [googleTalk : nowhiding ] > -- Steve Ross web application & interface developer http://blog.stevensross.com [mobile] (912) 344-8113 [ AIM / Yahoo! : zeriumsteven ] [googleTalk : nowhiding ]
