I'm typing too fast that should be "application"

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Steve Ross <[email protected]> wrote:

> the prefix "appliation" coldfusion is using to determine that the content
> of your request should be binary encoded. If you are posting xml it should
> probably be text/atom+xml instead of "appliation/atom+xml"
>
> -Steve
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Steve Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Clarke I misunderstood... I'm seeing the same thing on my end regardless
>> of the type... only until i removed this param did it send the data as xml:
>>
>> <cfhttpparam type="header" name="Content-Type"
>> value="application/atom+xml; charset=utf-8" />
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Steve Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> In your example it would be:
>>>  <cfhttpparam type="header" name="xml" value="#payload.Trim()#"
>>> encoded="no">
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Steve Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are you sure this param of type "xml" is right?
>>>>
>>>> CF ignores that when it is received... I wonder if your receiving
>>>> service needs something like this instead? :
>>>>
>>>>                 <cfhttpparam type="header" name="xml" value="#foo#" >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Steve Ross <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> test cfm:
>>>>>
>>>>> <cffile action = "read" file =
>>>>> "#GetDirectoryFromPath(GetCurrentTemplatePath())#test.xml" variable = 
>>>>> "foo"
>>>>> charset = "utf-8">
>>>>>  <cfhttp method="post" url="
>>>>> http://url.to.your.site.com/test/receiver.cfm";>
>>>>>                  <cfhttpparam type="header" name="Content-Type"
>>>>> value="application/atom+xml; charset=utf-8" />
>>>>>                 <cfhttpparam type="header"
>>>>> name="Content-transfer-encoding" value="text"/>
>>>>>                 <cfhttpparam type="header" name="Accept"
>>>>> value="application/atom+xml">
>>>>>  <cfhttpparam type="Header" name="Accept-Encoding" value="*">
>>>>> <cfhttpparam type="Header" name="TE" value="deflate;q=0">
>>>>>                 <cfhttpparam type="xml" value="#foo#" encoded="no">
>>>>> </cfhttp>
>>>>>
>>>>> receiver cfm:
>>>>>
>>>>> <cfsavecontent variable = "thedump">
>>>>> <cfdump
>>>>> var="#GetHttpRequestData()#"
>>>>>  label="GetHttpResponseData() Values"
>>>>> />
>>>>> </cfsavecontent>
>>>>>
>>>>> <cffile action = "write" file =
>>>>> "#GetDirectoryFromPath(GetCurrentTemplatePath())#/out.html" output =
>>>>> "#thedump#" />
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> open "out.html" in your browser
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Clarke Bishop <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> To better understand how CFHTTP & CFHTTPParam work, I’m trying Steve’s
>>>>>> idea to just call a local page to see what the header looks like.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But the content is showing up as binary like this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Content:HTTP Request Data - binary*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 606312010910832118101114115105111110613449464834321011109911110010511010361341171161024556346362131060101110116114121321201091081101156134104116116112584747119119119461195146111114103475048485347651161111093462131032326011610511610810162841041051153210511532116104101321091051101051099710832981081111033211211111511632116105116108101604711610511610810162131032323232326097117116104111114621310323232323232326011097109101627411110411032681111016047110971091016213103232323232323260101109971051086210611110411010011110164101120971091121081014699111109604710110997105108621310323232323260479711711610411111462131032323232326011511710910997114121628410410511532105115321161041013210910511010510997108329810811110332112111115116321151171091099711412146604711511710910997114121621310323232323260991111101161011101163211612111210161341041161091083462841041051153210511532116104101321159710911210810132728477763299111110116101110116466047991111101161011101166213103232323232609997116101103111114121321161011141096134116971033211111010134324762131032323232326099971161011031111141213211610111410961341169710332116119111343247621310604710111011611412162
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I set Content-transfer-encoding=” text” but the data is still binary.
>>>>>> I think it might be that it’s getting compressed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here’s my code:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <cfhttp method="post" url="#hsURL#">
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 <cfhttpparam type="header" name="Content-Type"
>>>>>> value="application/atom+xml; charset=utf-8" />
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 <cfhttpparam type="header"
>>>>>> name="Content-transfer-encoding" value="text"/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 <cfhttpparam type="header" name="Accept"
>>>>>> value="application/atom+xml">
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <cfhttpparam type="Header" name="Accept-Encoding" value="*">
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <cfhttpparam type="Header" name="TE" value="deflate;q=0">
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 <cfhttpparam type="xml" value="#payload.Trim()#"
>>>>>> encoded="no">
>>>>>>
>>>>>> </cfhttp>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These lines are supposed to turn off compression:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <cfhttpparam type="Header" name="Accept-Encoding" value="*">
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <cfhttpparam type="Header" name="TE" value="deflate;q=0">
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I also tried Charlie’s idea of adding the extra header values, but no
>>>>>> luck there, either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Charlie, you said it … Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Clarke
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Charlie
>>>>>> Arehart
>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, February 18, 2011 1:47 PM
>>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Troubleshooting CFHTTP Webservice Call
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And consider also the function gethttprequestdata on that test page.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Beyond that, the CFHTTP tag has proxy attributes. You may be able to
>>>>>> configure that so they go through Charles or another proxy. Of course, 
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> only works based on the assumption that the CF server dong the CFHTTP is
>>>>>> indeed on your local dev box, as you say it is in your case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Finally, I have some thoughts I’d gathered up yesterday, but I was
>>>>>> really opening that perhaps the XML type would solve the problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While perhaps your attempts to “see” what CF is sending (whether with
>>>>>> a proxy or on a test receiving page of your own), there may still just be
>>>>>> issues with what you’re trying to call instead, and its expectations.  
>>>>>> It’s
>>>>>> indeed frustrating when trying to understand why a remote server doesn’t
>>>>>> like what we send, and worse when (as in this case) it seems to complain
>>>>>> that we’re sending something we would swear we’re not (in your case, it’s
>>>>>> saying that you’re sending text/html when the header clearly tells it 
>>>>>> it’s
>>>>>> atom). Grr. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I’m sure at some point someone will solve it and we’ll all look back
>>>>>> smacking our foreheads at something we’re not seeing. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But until then, I can only offer a few thoughts from things I’ve found
>>>>>> as I’ve looked around. I realize these don’t seem like they should solve 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> problem, but it’s easy enough to throw them in and at least rule out that
>>>>>> they don’t help:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - I found an example of a call I’d made to a restful web service, and
>>>>>> I notice passed in the Accept which you’re not:  <cfhttpparam 
>>>>>> type="header"
>>>>>> name="Accept" value="application/atom+xml">. Again, I realize that 
>>>>>> shouldn’t
>>>>>> help the issue of what it thinks you’re *sending*.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - I wonder if it may help to add the charset to the content-type, as
>>>>>> in: <cfhttpparam type="header" name="Content-Type"
>>>>>> value="application/atom+xml; charset=utf-8" />. Again, doesn’t seem it
>>>>>> should be needed, but worth a shot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - I found a CF technote referring to how some atom-based services
>>>>>> require a multiparttype/related  header, and CF defaults to using
>>>>>> multipart/form-data. So a new attribute has been added to CFHTTP,
>>>>>> multiparttype="related". For more info, see
>>>>>> http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/406/kb406660.html (It appears the hotfix
>>>>>> adds the attribute for CF 7 and 8, and it’s included in CF9.) Again, I
>>>>>> realize it doesn’t seem related. Since you’re on CF8, I realize you may 
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> want to bother with the hotfix for this one—unless of course you see
>>>>>> something in the docs of what you’re calling that may say it needs you to
>>>>>> send as multipart/related.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /charlie
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve
>>>>>> Ross
>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, February 18, 2011 11:04 AM
>>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Troubleshooting CFHTTP Webservice Call
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To see what CFHTTP is doing send a request to another cfm locally on
>>>>>> your box and dump the incoming request.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Steve
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Clarke Bishop <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Charlie. I did try type=”xml” like you suggested, but it didn’t
>>>>>> help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think I need to better understand how CFHTTP/CFHTTPParam translate
>>>>>> into HTTP headers. I know what I want the request to look like, but how 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> make CF create that request is my challenge.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1.       Do you or anyone else know of any good examples or links for
>>>>>> how CF builds requests?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2.       Also, I still haven’t been able to get Charles to work with
>>>>>> my CF development server. Does anyone have any examples or links for how 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> setup Charles to show HTTP traffic from a CFHTTP. Charles has HTTP proxy 
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> SOCKS proxy options – Which one is better to use? And, what’s the best 
>>>>>> way
>>>>>> to get CF to route through the proxy?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Right now, I’m kind of stuck, so I really appreciate any ideas!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Clarke
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
>>>>>> http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
>>>>>> Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
>>>>>> List hosted by FusionLink <http://www.fusionlink.com>
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
>>>>>> http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
>>>>>> Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
>>>>>> List hosted by FusionLink <http://www.fusionlink.com>
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Steve Ross
>>>>> web application & interface developer
>>>>> http://blog.stevensross.com
>>>>> [mobile] (912) 344-8113
>>>>> [ AIM / Yahoo! : zeriumsteven ] [googleTalk : nowhiding ]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Steve Ross
>>>> web application & interface developer
>>>> http://blog.stevensross.com
>>>> [mobile] (912) 344-8113
>>>> [ AIM / Yahoo! : zeriumsteven ] [googleTalk : nowhiding ]
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve Ross
>>> web application & interface developer
>>> http://blog.stevensross.com
>>> [mobile] (912) 344-8113
>>> [ AIM / Yahoo! : zeriumsteven ] [googleTalk : nowhiding ]
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Steve Ross
>> web application & interface developer
>> http://blog.stevensross.com
>> [mobile] (912) 344-8113
>> [ AIM / Yahoo! : zeriumsteven ] [googleTalk : nowhiding ]
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Steve Ross
> web application & interface developer
> http://blog.stevensross.com
> [mobile] (912) 344-8113
> [ AIM / Yahoo! : zeriumsteven ] [googleTalk : nowhiding ]
>



-- 
Steve Ross
web application & interface developer
http://blog.stevensross.com
[mobile] (912) 344-8113
[ AIM / Yahoo! : zeriumsteven ] [googleTalk : nowhiding ]

Reply via email to