If you are going to be building robust error handling, it would likely be worth your time to upgrade the Application.cfm's to Application.cfc's now. Because you get so much more control of specific events in the CFC version, it lends itself well to better error handling, IMHO. Ben Nadel's blog has some excellent write-ups of how to work with the CFC version if you aren't familiar with it. :) --Ken
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Matthew Nicholson < [email protected]> wrote: > That was actually one of my initial thoughts since my play around with > settings didn’t have any affect. > > > > But, no, couldn’t find any Application.cfc’s either and that certainly left > me a little puzzled to be sure. > > > > *Matthew R. Nicholson* > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of * > [email protected] > *Sent:* Friday, March 11, 2011 3:35 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Error Handling and CF8 > > > > Well, here's a quick tip for you - you mentioned you only searched for > Application.cfm files, you might want to include Application.cfc to that > search. Application.cfc is the "newer" version of Application.cfm and has > many more events that can be handled at page/application load times. You > might have several of those floating around where you'll want to put in your > error handling. > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Matthew > Nicholson > *Sent:* Friday, March 11, 2011 3:31 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Error Handling and CF8 > > Excellent point! > > > > I’ll admit, I’m still quite new to working with CF and coming behind a > number of developers onto a project with a less than ideal documentation > policy… well… you get the idea… :) > > > > Thankfully, I love a good challenge. :D > > > > *Matthew R. Nicholson* > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of * > [email protected] > *Sent:* Friday, March 11, 2011 3:25 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Error Handling and CF8 > > > > :-) > > > > That's not uncommon...each Application.cfm or Application.cfc can be used > for separate applications, or can be used to help keep directories from > being secured, etc. It's just part of the CF framework - wouldn't call it a > mess just because there's multiple of them! Might be that it is a mess, > but, multiple Application files definitely have their place. > > > > Allen > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Matthew > Nicholson > *Sent:* Friday, March 11, 2011 3:22 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Error Handling and CF8 > > Ah Ha! > > > > Looks as though I was barking up the wrong Application.cfm… > > > > I’ve found one that’s not encrypted and is apparently being used by my > application mixed in all the source that I hadn’t noticed before. > > > > How many of these “Application.cfm” files are typically built into a single > CF server? Oddly enough, I’ve found about 8 on this box. What a mess… > > > > *Matthew R. Nicholson* > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mark > Bureau > *Sent:* Friday, March 11, 2011 3:17 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Error Handling and CF8 > > > > looks like it might be encrypted. > > > > *From:* Matthew Nicholson <[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Friday, March 11, 2011 3:08 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* [ACFUG Discuss] Error Handling and CF8 > > > > Afternoon All! > > > > I’m trying to setup error handling for our production environment to be > more sophisticated then explosion followed by a crash and burn. > > > > With that, I’ve been able to find a wealth of tutorials on how to set > templates and all sorts of other goodies but a majority of them require me > to modify the Application.cfm or Application.cfc. > > > > My server(s) are all running vanilla CF8 and only use the Application.cfm. > However, I’m unable to modify the file, I get a whole bunch of goop (with an > example below) when I attempt to modify the file in just about every editor > I have access to. > > > > *Example*: > ------------------------------ > > N > ------------------------------ > > P > ------------------------------ > > ¶¢**´ > > > > Is it encrypted? Am I being thick? Any direction would be greatly > appreciated as always! > > > > Thanks! > > > > *Matthew R. Nicholson* > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ > http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform > > For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists > Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ > List hosted by FusionLink <http://www.fusionlink.com> > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ > http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform > > For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists > Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ > List hosted by FusionLink <http://www.fusionlink.com> > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > n��N�����r��y����b�X��f�j���鮇����j�~m�����~�(�ږ�"��b��‑��+�m�����~�(�ږ�"�� > b��‑��+�����Ţ�����~�‑y�ky�m���� q����?����x%��l��i��0��� +����X��X����n� > +r�y�ky�m���� &j)Z��b��(��b�ˬ�*'�F�~�(���� � 0���j�!����o݊�.�Ȩ��q����?��� > .+-��-y��j�~m������*'�)�r���Ȩ���� > > nNrybXfj鮇j| > qhvi > > �n���{.n�+�������+%��fjv�{*.���~)^n������� � 0i��}�h�)�v+n��ߢ���� � 0i�� > }�h�)�v+n��ߢ��i�۬Z+��ފw��皆����i��0��� +����X��X���m���� q����?����x%��l > ���[1]�!��������i��0�f���܆+�r��v+ ��"�~4i���m���� ��V�r�y�&�جr�,���ѧ� + > ���n����h�םo&������ � 0~�"�yb�G(�[���ˊy?i� > > nNryزXfjꮇj|q >
