On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:43:39AM +0000, Sam Liddicott wrote: > Something working soonest is always best, so maybe typo3.
I disagree - something which is maintainable in the long term is best, IMHO. If a CMS is set up which turns out to be a pig to maintain in the long run, then it's going to be hard to find people willing to commit the time to maintain it and it'll fall into disarray. Don't get me wrong - ease of setup is useful, but it's not the be-all and end-all. BGW's been going for years, so a CMS which is (hopefully) still going to be maintainable in a few years' time is important. Cheers, Gareth
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
