> Because PGP was software, not documentation. Such a clause would > be prefectly ok for free documentation.
Again: Documentation is part of the software. It _can_ be part of the program, but for Emacs and the GNU C library and other works, this isn't the case. They are two seperatly licensed entities. PGP as a whole was licensed under a non-free software license. > You can ask the FSF to make a execption for examples. This makes > sense, and I doubt anyone would object. I tried to tell that there are 48 lines of actual description (a work) plus some more lines with examples. What was the result? Cheers. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
