-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alfred M. Szmidt schrieb: > Because it doesn't make sense to license manuals/documentation under > the GPL. Software and manuals are different type of works. You don't > use the GPL as the license for music or pictures. I read something different lately [1]: LinuxP2P: Can the GPL be applied to artwork? For example, most of the people who submit wallpapers to KDE-Look.org submit them under the GPL, would the GPL's terms still apply, considering it isn't software.
RMS: There must be some basic misunderstanding here. If a work is released under the GPL, then the GPL's terms apply to it. How could it possibly be otherwise? > > I suggest that you read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-doc.html I'll do (again). Best wishes Michael [1] http://www.linuxp2p.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=10771 - -- Nobody can save your freedom but YOU - become a fellow of the FSF Europe! http://www.fsfe.org/en -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD7MvAQggFxokHT60RAujgAJwKAv0VMndn6O25S4vOFi8Ml2VwhgCgjoOe HpSdgClynQHd5zVro8G9evY= =tjv8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
