"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sorry for being unclear, I meant that a manual isn't in its whole a > functional work, and can contain non-functional parts, like an > dedication. > > > Note that it claims the FDL purpose is for functional work. > > ... with non-functional parts.
Were that true, then the FDL preamble would be an argument that the FDL is not suitable for applying to invariant sections. > > Because such restrictions make sense, you don't need the right to > > modify my thoughts about why I wrote the book, or to whom I > > dedicated the book. [...] > > Someone modifying your essay should not modify your thoughts! > Please consult a mental health expert if you find it does! > > Please consult a English teacher. You first. It does make a difference whether we are seeking to modify your essay or your thoughts. (I'm a native English-speaker, with some problems, but illiteracy is not one of them TTBOMK.) > [... more flame bait ...] > > Are you really incapable of having a leavel headed discussion without > resorting to these kind of silly arguments? I think a level-headed discussion is impossible if you are going to contradict the licence you claim to support. Please stick to the FDL. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
