At Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:09:48 +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > > "Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > So, was this a mistake? And if so, has it be corrected? > > > > May this be a lesson to all. > > In case anyone missed it, the lesson was: publicise problems. > The corrections happened after it was posted to many lists. > > Also, it's only a postponement, not a long-term fix. Please > help explain to [EMAIL PROTECTED] why requiring a > known-buggy GPL-incompatible licence is a bad idea.
Requiring a certain license is just a stupid thing to begin with. The requirement should be that it's free (or you can add the extra requirement that it should be GPL-compatible like gna.org has, that's also useful because you then share all code). But if somebody wants to release his documentation under the BSD license, I don't see any reason why that should be forbidden by savannah. Jeroen Dekkers _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
