Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > > You are confusing a already written work, and a work that doesn't > > yet exist where one invents something from scratch. The later is > > infact protected by libel, slander, and other such laws. The > > former is not. > > Yet another unfounded claim. Can you back it up with some arguments > or references? Otherwise you're just wasting our time. > > Clearly, if you consider it false, it is your job to back it up. Not > mine.
You make the claim, you have to prove it. Do you believe "valid until disproven" is a reasonable method of argument? > The only person wasting anyones time is you. If you are to lazy to > look it up in a legal codex, please refrain from participating in this > discussion. What I have written is clearly stated in several legal > codexes around the world, including the license of which a work is > licensed under. References please! > That you are to lazy to be bothered to read any of > this, I read all the refences you provided (which are exactly zero, so far). > and resort to inflammatory remarks is simply sad. What exactly was inflammatory in my comment? This is another claim (and accusation) you made that you need to back up. Frank -- Frank Heckenbach, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fjf.gnu.de/ GnuPG and PGP keys: http://fjf.gnu.de/plan (7977168E) _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
