I agree. But as I've proposed and asked before, do we really need a revised FDL or other new license to achieve that goal? Wouldn't it suffice to put the primary content under the (L)GPL and the "invariant sections" under a simple unlimited-distribution, no-modification license?
The GPL/Lesser GPL are specificially designed for software. And for either of those to be suitable for documentation, they would need extensive changes. For example, large parts section 2 simply cannot apply to documents. Such a change would also allow for documents which are completly invariant, something the GFDL specifically disallows. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
