Frank: > [...] So far, you haven't tried to explain your opinion (i.e., why > you don't consider these scenarios problematic, or else which > benefits the FDL gives that would justify the problems), [...]
Alfred: > Once again you resort to outright lying. I have repeatedly shown why > invariant sections make sense: You do not need the right to modify > what I think about fluffy puppies. > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-doc.html also explain is well. Frank is not lying. You did _not_ address the problems. You have repeatedly shown why _in_your_opinion_ invariant sections make sense, without touching on the problems (fwiw, I think they make sense, but the problems outweight the benetis). Passing your opinion as truth and banning other opinions as "absurd", up to stating that the Debian position is "absurd by all logical means"[1], and addressing your party with "you simply invent absurd lies"[2] makes no good to anyone. There are different opinions out there, but they are _all_ opinions. Nobody is lying when expressing an opinion, so please stop replying yo each and every mail just to have your points and attacks[3] repeated over and over. As Simo Sorce suggested, let's agree to disagree and stop this useless thread. BTW, you agreed to disagree about semantics quite some time ago[4], so why are we still wasting everyone's time? [1] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> again [3] "cluttering the list with abusrd lies" in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Once again you resort to outright lying" quoted above, from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "The only person who has resprted to personal insults is you." in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "You have repeatedly shown a clear lack of comprehension skills" in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and so on. [4] On Feb 11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
