On 24-Oct-2006, Alex Hudson wrote: > My concern in that respect isn't whether or not the GPLv3 can > function effectively in that regard (although I'm not convinced it > covers a particularly wide class of DRM measures); but that it seems > more concerned with post-violation compliance, and I wonder if there > will be fewer routes available to both authors and violators in the > future. We've had a fairly peaceful situation so far where it's > relatively easy to come into compliance; it would be best not to > change that IMHO.
The terms of the GPL (any version) don't speak to "concern[...] with post-violation compliance" or not. That's entirely up to the copyright holder (or whoever is doing the enforcement). -- \ "Welchen Teil von 'Gestalt' verstehen Sie nicht? [What part of | `\ 'gestalt' don't you understand?]" -- Karsten M. Self | _o__) | Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
