Sam Liddicott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Whether or not it "being no different than the requirement for the GPL > or a GPL compatable license when it comes to software" is a material > concern is a personal matter. [...]
FWIW, it's clearly different: the GPL can be used for manuals, but is not an FDL-compatible licence, because it does not allow addition of unremovable adverts and the other FDL problems. So, requiring FDL-compatibility means requiring something less sharing-protective for the manuals than the GPL. :-/ I'll leave it with http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2006/fdl#general I can't find my Savannah-FDL links just now. Hope that explains, -- MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Somerset, England. Work/Laborejo: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ IRC/Jabber/SIP: on request/peteble _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
