Sex, 2006-12-22 às 10:31 +0100, Xavi Drudis Ferran escreveu: > > Ter, 2006-12-12 Ã s 09:36 +0000, Alex Hudson escreveu: > > > Huge interpretation problem on *your* *side*: > > > > It's not <->, but only -> > > > > <- is impossible to do fully by definition of OXML > > > > Hence it's an ODF->OXML Microsoft-funded converter. > > > > To reject this backstage deal is not a specific political purpose, but a > > matter of survival. > > > > To reject an extension to a free software program is trying to make > it non free. Freedom in software must extend even to unwanted acts. > Fortunately the freedoms of really free software can't be taken back. > > Who do you think we are to reject free software contributions ?
If you notice, I said "reject this backstage deal".
There's no need for this "backstage deal" in order for OO.o to support
OpenXML. This was a deal which has had already achieved enormous
success:
LOOK HOW WE'RE FIGHTING EACH OTHER OVER THIS SUBJECT!
Rui
--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
