-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
If you distribute a GPL-derived work to one of your clients, you are
obliged to give the sources to them, and only to them. No one else is
entitled to a copy of the sources, if they did not get the binaries.
Of course, your client is then free to give binaries *and* sources to
whomever they please, subject to the same requirement.
Whether changing configuration files, instead of sources,
constitutes a
derived work is a murkier matter, with no general answers.
he he, you centered the question... that's my problem
anyway i have no problem at all, when integrating everything, if i
find a bug, to correct it, contact the project maintainer, and
distribute the source to my customers
the problem is just on "configuration" and "bundling" scripts,
that's my "asset" ... i get payed for
- --
Guido Serra aka Zeph
http://guidoserra.it
+39 348 4313 992
sistemista e sviluppatore
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFGC6yfEDyqaTiRzQsRAsrLAJ4/M1N+OtlNEnpe6wUxiGSOBw8dYACcD1Ls
UthsDNCyLJF0KgkWNWVANXY=
=3APK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
