MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, the GPL hasn't always attached requirements to "making it > available for others to use".
I didn't say it did. I said that X was "more similar" to Y than it is to Z. I didn't say X == Y. > Ciaran claimed that [...] does this mean the FSF will [...]? (Note: I don't work for FSF or set policy for GNU. FSFE and FSF are independent in terms of management, staff, and finances.) FWIW, barring a change in technology or in the way people use computers and networks, I don't think that AGPL will be a widely used licence, so I don't see any big GFDL-sized controversies coming. -- Ciarán O'Riordan __________________ \ Support Free Software and GNU/Linux http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ _________ \ Join FSFE's Fellowship: http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/weblog \ http://www.fsfe.org _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
