MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > By the way, the GPLv3 AGPL-friendly clause is only friendly to AGPLv3, > so what happens when AGPLv4 or AGPLv3.1 comes out? Oops?
I should first point out that it's very unlikely that an AGPL-specific update will be required. For one reason, there're only two paragraphs of AGPL-specific text. For another, at a guess (barring major changes in technology usage which might make the AGPL a really good idea), the AGPL will only be used by a handful of projects. But, in this very unlikely event, if the harm is worth the effort, FSF can start working on a GPLv4 or 3.1. (And knowing that FSF will update the licences if any exploits are found decreases the value of looking for exploits.) -- Ciarán O'Riordan __________________ \ Support Free Software and GNU/Linux http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ _________ \ Join FSFE's Fellowship: http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/weblog \ http://www.fsfe.org _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
