simo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think a very important consideration is how much probable it is for an > AGPL project to be successful. So far I know (I am ignorant tho) of no > really successful AGPL based projects. [...]
How about http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/ ? Over 3.9 million users seems pretty successful to me. I'm surprised that a member of a GPL drafting committees[*] was not told where the AGPL is currently causing problems when being asked to review a GPL that adds compatibility with it. Weren't the committees given briefings on the current use of these licences? Didn't they ask? [*] Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [...] It is a theoretical > possibility yes, does it warrant all the fuss? [...] This is more than a theoretical problem, so yes. simo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I surrender, you clearly master English better than me, and I can't try > to use rhetoric with such a big handicap, you will always find an easy > way to turn what I say to your advantage. Maybe instead of trying "to use rhetoric" or surrendering, it would be helpful to address the concerns or explain the reasons? Just a suggestion. Hope that explains, -- MJ Ray http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html tel:+44-844-4437-237 - Webmaster-developer, statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder, consumer and workers co-operative member http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ - Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
