"David Gerard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Interesting it's not listed on http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/ > - which is the usual place people would go to check if a given licence > is GPL-compatible.
FSF's list isn't intended to be complete. I don't know FSF's reasons for choosing the licences they have, but I think that OSI's approach (where contributors to licence proliferation are rewarded with free advertising) proved that completeness has drawbacks. -- CiarĂ¡n O'Riordan (+32 477 36 44 19) \ Support Free Software and GNU/Linux http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ _________ \ Join FSFE's Fellowship: http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/weblog \ http://www.fsfe.org _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
