"David Gerard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Interesting it's not listed on http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/
> - which is the usual place people would go to check if a given licence
> is GPL-compatible.

FSF's list isn't intended to be complete.

I don't know FSF's reasons for choosing the licences they have, but I think
that OSI's approach (where contributors to licence proliferation are
rewarded with free advertising) proved that completeness has drawbacks.

-- 
CiarĂ¡n O'Riordan (+32 477 36 44 19) \ Support Free Software and GNU/Linux
http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ _________ \     Join FSFE's Fellowship:
http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/weblog \      http://www.fsfe.org
_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion

Reply via email to