Am Donnerstag, dem 05. Feb 2009 schrieb David Gerard: > For pedants: there have been some exceptions. [...]
> I don't know of any license that's OSI-approved that isn't also FSF > "free software". As I mentioned, I remember the license for Open Watcom was rejected by the FSF. I don't know the exact reasons anymore. But the reasons for rejecting the NASA Open Source Agreement is still there on their licenses page... But I did not want to harp on that. We all agree that those are just few exceptions. All in all Free Software and Open Source accept almost the same licenses. Saying "different viewpoints in one community" sounds good for me. -- AKFoerster _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
