Am Montag, dem 09. Mar 2009 schrieb David Gerard: > 2009/3/9 Noah Slater <[email protected]>: > > > Unfortunately, where I would normally agree here, the FSF's definition of > > software freedom is the canonical one. Debian has it's DFSG, which is fine. > > The > > OSI has it's own too, which is great. But it is perfectly reasonable for > > someone > > with an FSF hat on to disagree that this is free software. > > > Oh yes, advocacy is perfectly understandable. However, confusing a > strongly held opinion with an objective fact is muddled thinking, e.g. > GNU/Linux versus Linux - the former is an opinion that FSF advocates > like to state as a fact, the latter is what the rest of the world > calls it in English. > > (I started http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU/Linux_naming_controversy > and helped get it to Wikipedia featured status.)
Let's stop bickering. The best article about the naming controversy ist still this one: http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Richard_M_Stallman_Vs._Linus_Torvalds ;-) -- AKFoerster _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
