Theo Schmidt <[email protected]> writes: > Ideal? Pragmatic? Compromise? > > ODT DOC RTF (if no fancy formatting) > HTML (a very good exchange format for some people and > tasks) > PDF (if no major editting required)
This is the kind of concrete information that in my opinion would make http://www.documentfreedom.org/ a better site. Hugo's "Send me attachments I can read, use open standards!" concentrates on email. This is a particularly challenging environment since it is usually not ok to send the same data in multiple different formats (large emails are frowned upon). I think we should be more general and not concentrate on email alone. Offering both ODT and PDF is easy on a web site. In my opinion converting one web site to use open standards also matters a lot more than converting a single email user simply because a web site usually influences more people. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
