hi Marcos, * Marcos Marado <[email protected]> [2012-02-13 16:31:22 +0000]:
> I'm not sure you've noticed that I've worked a bit on it this weekend. > As I said in my last note there: No I have not noticed it before. > > Marcos Marado: if we end up only having three groups (I'm not sure if 4 is > > the minimum), then we have two categories covered, and only have to deal > > with "Network" and "Data" We need 4 categories for the game. Another idea is also to split it in other groups and also add older standards (not just Open Standards). Than we could add MS OOXML / DOCX, .sxw, ... > I think this is feasible: we just need someone to look up those 16 standards > on wikipedia to see their creation year and the link for the specification, > then just: > $ wget http://link-to-spec.txt -o /dev/null -O - |wc --words > or, if the spec is only available on HTML, > $ wget http://link-to-spec.html -o /dev/null -O - |html2text |wc --words Someone here able to do that? > Checking out the Freedom Level is more time-consuming, but answering those > five questions/points ( http://fsfe.org/projects/os/def.en.html ) is not that > hard... Can someone answer the questions? And than we should double check. What about: we just give 1 point if the question is answered with yes, and 0 if answered with no? Regards, Matthias -- Matthias Kirschner - FSFE - Fellowship Coordinator, German Coordinator FSFE, Linienstr. 141, 10115 Berlin, t +49-30-27595290 +49-1577-1780003 Free Software is important to you? Join today! (fsfe.org/join) Weblog (blogs.fsfe.org/mk) - Contact (fsfe.org/about/kirschner) _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
