* Mirko Boehm <[email protected]> [2012-12-11 23:01:08 +0100]: > > Please also have a look at: > > > > http://fsfe.org/activities/os/msooxml-interoperability.en.html > > > > Example #3: Microsoft's Open Specification Promise is not reliable > > legal coverage for complete interoperability > > In this regard, I am trying to understand risks involved with the > oData "standard". I think the OOXML case is different in that now with > oData, competiting implementations are developing from the beginning > (the spec is available while Microsoft develops their own product, not > after). > > Do you think that makes a difference?
I am not sure at the moment. I would need to look more into the details again. What do others here think? Regards, Matthias -- Matthias Kirschner - FSFE - Fellowship Coordinator, German Coordinator FSFE, Linienstr. 141, 10115 Berlin, t +49-30-27595290 +49-1577-1780003 Weblog (blogs.fsfe.org/mk) - Contact (fsfe.org/about/kirschner) Support FSFE! http://fsfe.org/support/?mk _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
