Without intended to promote dissent, I like UEFI with secure boot when I can upload the signing keys and there is a physical switch on such key storage. That way I can secure my own machine and retain my own freedom.
I acknowledge that UEFI + secure boot generally refers to something more restrictive On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Tanguy Ortolo <[email protected]>wrote: > Hugo Roy, 2013-01-18 15:59+0100: > > Le vendredi 18 janvier 2013 à 09:16 -0500, simo a écrit : > >> What's wrong with UEFI ? > > > > Thank you Simo for pointing it out. What's usually wrong with UEFI (the > > replacement for BIOS) is the "Secure Boot" feature. Matthias published > > an analysis on fsfe.org: > > > http://fsfe.org/campaigns/generalpurposecomputing/secure-boot-analysis.en.html > > But note that there are computers with an UEFI and no Secure Boot. > > -- > Tanguy > > _______________________________________________ > Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion >
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
