Fellowship of FSFE <[email protected]> wrote: > - Matthew Garrett criticised Canonical's contributor agreement[19]. > Other copyright assignment tools, such as FSFE's Fiduciary License > Agreement[20] and the GNU Project's copyright assignment, enable > developers to prevent their code from being used in non-free software. > In contrast, Canonical's agreement explicitly states that the company > may distribute people's contributions under non-free licenses. If you > value software freedom, FSFE recommends you not to sign agreements > which make it possible to distribute your code under non-free > licenses.
Is this recommendation, the reasoning behind it and the process that led to it documented somewhere? The recommendation seems to imply that people who prefer or don't object to non-viral free software licenses don't value software freedom. Fabian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
